Home  l  Contact Us

ISSN 0971-8966

Wadia Institute of Himalayan Geology

Home

Journal Information
Current Issue
Contents
Editors
Announcement

Other Publications

Life Time Membership

Subscription Information
Availability of Publications
Individual Subscription
Institutional Subscription
Book Agency Subscription
(on Trade Discount)

Manuscript Submission
Online Submission
Contact Us
wihg.gif (2712 bytes)

Himalayan Geology
(Journal)

<<back     Print

Abstract:

Himalayan Geology, Vol. 31 (2), 2010, pp. 83-95, Printed in India

DAVOD POREH
Tu Freiberg; Freiberg (09599); Germany; Agricolla Str.14-No1702A;
Email: d.poreh@gmail.com

Abstract: Because drainage networks respond rapidly to tectonic changes, fluvial geomorphological patterns have the potential to elucidate the effects of active faulting and folding in the Zagros tectonic belt of western and southwestern Iran. This paper focuses on utilizing drainage patterns extracted from SRTM (Shuttle Radar Topography Mission) and SPOT 4 (Satellite Pour l’Observation de la Terre) data along with fractal and river profile analysis to constrain the tectonic behavior of the Zagros region. We digitized the drainage networks of entire Zagros Mountains in 1:250,000 scale in the GIS environment and also extracted the drainage network from DEMs (based on D8 and MFD methods) and analyzed rivers using the stream power-law scaling.

Lithologic control on river-profile forms is reflected by steepness, concavity, and knickpoints in a number of longitudinal profiles. Knickpoints are identified using elevation distance plots. Steepness and concavity are identified using slope-area log-log plots. Sedimentary rocks are the principal rocks types underlying the Zagros area (between 26° and 35°N) where bedrock and mixed bedrock–alluvial channels occur. The highest concavity measured is (q= 2.90); it is commonly at q= 0.30-0.50. We observe no systematic relationship between steepness indices and concavity in the study area.

Fractal analysis (box counting method) executed in the Zagros area to measure the fractal dimension of streams. The highest calculated fractal dimension (D) is 1.18 and the lowest fractal dimension is 1.02. We are led to conclude that channel profiles along the study area reflect a lot of information about the uplifting, fault activities, and folds evolutions.