|
Geological signatures of the Ropar Tear in Ropar- Nalagarh sector
of the
Northwestern Himalaya, India
R.J. SINGH, D.D. JOSHI, PRABHAS PANDE Geological Survey of India, Lucknow,
India
Email: ramjivan_singh@yahoo.co.in
Evolution of frontal Siwalik ridges along the southernmost limit of the
Northwestern Himalaya represents the last orogenic movement in the Himalayan
Belt during Quaternary time. The Himalayan Frontal Thrust (HFT) marks the
boundary between
the youngest Siwalik foothills and the Indus (or Punjab) Plain in the NW
Himalaya (Nakata 1989; Karunakaran & Ranga Rao 1979; Power et al. 1998;
Raiverman et al. 1979, 1993; Malik & Nakata 2003; Malik et al. 2003). Due to
ongoing convergence of Indian and Eurasian plates, the zone of deformation
within the Himalaya has successively shifted southwards with regional
faulting and folding along the Main Central Thrust (MCT), the Main Boundary
Thrust (MBT) and the Himalayan Frontal Thrust (HFT) (Gansser 1964;
Scheilling & Arita 1991; Lave & Avouac 2000 & Bilham et al. 2001). The most
active deformation zone lies within the Himalayan Frontal Belt between the
MBT and HFT, particularly along the HFT and associated transverse faults (Valdiya
1976, 2001, 2003; Jain 1987; Nakata 1989; Kumar et al. 2001; Banerjee 2002
and Yeats & Lillie 1991). A balanced cross section of Kangra reentrant
indicates a minimum of 23 km shortening occurred since 1.9-1.5 Ma, along the
Sub- Himalayan decollement having 2.5º northward dip and yields a shortening
rate of 14± 2 mm/yr.
It indicates that approximately 25% of the total India-Eurasia convergence
at this longitude is accommodated within the Himalayan Frontal Belt or Sub-
Himalaya (Power et al. 1998). The HFT is mostly a buried or blind fault,
except with few emergent minor splay faults in Ropar sector of the NW
Himalayan Frontal Belt. The NW-SE trending Janauri anticlinal ridge and
Chandigarh Anticlinal ridge located towards west and east of Ropar (or
Rupnagar) town (Long. 76º31’31.65" : Lat 30º58’30.68") respectively, are
comprised mainly of the Upper Siwalik rocks. The southernmost and youngest
frontal Siwalik ridges are formed as fault propagation folds/ anticlines
(frontal foreland fold) and its lateral propagation along the southwest
vergent HFT and northeast vergent back fault, as wrinkle ridges. With
consistent N-S compression, the differential shortening of fault propagation
folds/ anticlines and coalescing segments of anticlinal frontal Siwalik
ridges is mainly accommodated by the transfer faults/ tear faults with
differential displacement between the anticlines or segments of the
anticlines (Jain 1987; Power et al. 1998; Singh et al. 2005; Singh & Tandon
2007; Delcaillau 2006).
The apparent left- lateral shift of the NW-SE trending continuous frontal
Siwalik ridges (i.e. Janauri and Chandigarh ridges) and abrupt southerly
deflection of the mighty Satluj River at Ropar signify the Ropar Tear, a
prominent transverse feature of the region. The outer Siwalik ridges in the
Northwestern Himalaya, particularly in the Ropar region comprise dominantly
clay, soft sandstone with minor conglomerate rocks of the Upper Siwalik of
the Plio- Pleistocene age, along with younger alluvial terraces and fan
deposits. From south to north in the area, the alluvial deposits of Satluj
River and its tributaries and fan deposits of piedmont zone, the Upper
Siwalik molasses of frontal ridges, alluvial deposits of Satluj and Sirsa
Rivers and its tributaries, along with northern side thick fan deposits in
Soan Dun valley and the Lower Siwalik molasses are exposed in the
northernmost part. These litho- sequences are marked by nearly parallel
tectonic planes of the NW Himalaya in Ropar- Nalagarh sector, from south to
north named as the HFT, back fault of the frontal ridge and Nalagarh Thrust
(NaT), along with few NE-SW to ENE-WSW trending cross faults/ transverse
faults of the Ropar Tear zone (Fig. 1). The NW-SE trending, longitudinal
Soan-Pinjaur Dun valley is an intramontane, backlimb depression and
comprises of isolated hillocks of the Upper Siwalik, fluvial fan and terrace
deposits initiated before 96 ka and continue up to present (Kumar et al.,
2007 and Suresh et al. 2007). The elongated outer Siwalik ridges in southern
part followed by tectonic, intramontane ridge.
3/54.jpg)
parallel Soan Dun valley and Nalagarh Hill ranges (of the Lower Siwaliks) in
the northern part show a typical setup of thrust related anticlines and
piggyback tectonic valleys in the frontal active tectonic region (Burbank &
Anderson 2000 and Keller & Pinter 2002). Abrupt southward turning of the
southeasterly flowing Satluj river with a straight cut to 50 m high (from
alluvial plain level) frontal ridges at Ropar water gap area, indicate the
presence of a transverse structural weak zone. This gap area within the
frontal ridges is highly influenced by the fluvial activities of Satluj
River system and covered by terrace, fan and Soan Dun deposits in upstream
and alluvial fan, flood plain and terrace deposits in the Punjab plain.
Ground signatures of the Ropar Tear are often concealed by these Quaternary
deposits. Four prominent transverse tectonic lineaments/ zones have been
delineated by study of the remote sensing data like aerial photographs, PAN
merged LISS-III digital imagery, digital images of Google Earth site of
Internet, digital elevation model (DEM) of SRTM data, geological and seismo-
tectonic maps of the area along with geological field works; the prominent
lineaments are as i) NE-SW trending Ropar- Nagal- Dhabota- Jhandori, ii)
N60ºES60 º W trending Ropar- Manguwal- Nalagarh, iii) ENE- WSW trending
Ropar- Nanakpur- Nanowal and iv) NE-SW trending Jhandian- Mandiarpur (Fig.
1). These lineaments are feebly represented near Ropar due to extensive
riverine activities of the Satluj River and its tributaries. Along the first
lineament, westerly facing, small normal fault with moderate dip has been
observed
within the Upper Siwalik rocks near Nagal (Fig. 2).
The crushing of sandstone of the Lower Siwalik Formation along with NE-SW
trending criss- cross fractures have been observed within the same tectonic
zone/ lineament near Jhandori. Along the second lineament, westerly facing,
high angle reverse and normal minor faults have been observed within the
Lower Siwalik sandstone and shale rocks near Nalagarh (Fig. 3). Westerly
facing, steep normal faults have been observed along the third lineament
within the Upper Siwalik rocks near east of Nanowal along Sirsa River
section (Fig. 4). Along the fourth lineament, NE-SW trending westerly
facing, normal cross faults with moderate dips have been identified near
Jhandian at southern side of the Chandigarh Ridge and Mandiyarpur at
northern side of the ridge along Sirsa River section (Fig. 5). Four levels
of terraces related to episodic
3/55.jpg)
tectonic upheavals and corresponding incisions by Satluj River have been
observed at Ropar. Almost undeformed, the oldest T4 terrace lies at the top
of Chandigarh Ridge and Janauri Ridge near Ropar, directly on clay-
sandstone rocks of the Upper Siwalik Formation. Beside these exposed
transverse faults, many geomorphic evidences like abrupt change in river
course, subvertical and linear escarpments, and linear extensive weathering
and erosion valleys are observed within these cross fault zones. The beds of
the Upper Siwalik rocks of the Janauri Anticline show gentle (5º-20º)
northerly dips. In western vicinity of Ropar, the Siwalik rocks of the
Janauri Anticline show overturned beds with sub- vertical to steep northerly
dips at southern contact of the ridge to the piedmont zone. Within the same
marginal zone,
3/56.jpg)
meso-scale fault propagation folds along northerly dipping multiple thrusts
planes, crushing, shattering and criss- cross small faults along with
slickensides are also observed in the clay and sandstone sequences of the
Upper Siwalik Formation. These geological evidences indicate that the
Janauri ridge might be formed as fault propagation fold due to southwest
verging movement along the blind HFT and its splay faults. On contrary, the
clay, sandstone and conglomerate beds of the Upper Siwalik Formation of the
Chandigarh Anticline show gentle to moderate (10º-35º) southerly dips east
of Ropar. It indicates the blind or buried nature of the HFT at the southern
margin of this ridge in Ropar sector. The rocks of the northern edge of the
Chandigarh Anticline show low to moderate (10º-40º) southerly dips along
with sub- vertical and fairly straight escarpment along the Sirsa River
section. An emergent and active back fault/ thrust may be interpreted along
the northern margin of this ridge in Ropar- Nalagarh sector. The NW-SE
trending axis of the Chandigarh Anticline shows WNW-ESE to E-W axial trace
near east of Ropar.
The inflection point of the axial bend lying within the NE-SW trending
Jhandian- Mandiarpur transverse lineament cum fault (no.-iv) accommodate the
differential compression within the anticlinal ridge. The variation in
disposition of the Siwalik rocks and fold axes within the both ridges along
with occurrence of cross faults indicate a lateral ramp like situation
within the HFT zone to produce the Ropar Tear. Thus, the variation in
folding style, disposition of beds within the both ridges along with
occurrence of the NE-SW to ENE- WSW trending cross faults with normal and
reverse slip components characterize the Ropar Tear zone around Ropar-
Nalagarh area.
3/57.jpg)
References
Banerjee, P. 2002. Crustal shortening and tectonics of the NW Himalaya from
GPS measurements.www.gisdevelopment.net/proceedings/asiangps/
002/overview/cdsoo2pf.htm
Bilham, R., Gaur, V.K., Molnar, P. 2001. Himalayan Seismic Hazard. Science,
293, 1442-1444. Burbank, D.W., Anderson, R.S. 2000. Tectonic geomorphology.
Blackwell
Publishing, Oxford, 274p.
Gansser, A. 1964. Geology of the Himalayas. Interscience Publishers, London,
289p.
Jain, A.K. 1987. Kinematics of the transverse lineaments, regional and
tectonics and Holocene stress field in the Garhwal Himalaya. Journal of
Geological Society of India, 30, 169- 186.
Karunakaran, C., Ranga Rao, A. 1979. Himalayan Geology Seminar, New Delhi,
Section-III. GSI Miscellaneous Publication, 41, 1-66. Keller, E., Pinter, N.
2002. Active tectonics: Earthquakes, uplift and landscape. Prentice Hall, 3,
38. Kumar, R., Suresh, N. Sangode, S.J., V. Kumaravel 2007. Evolution of the
Quaternary alluvial fan system in the Himalayan foreland basin:
Implications for tectonics and climatic decoupling. Quaternary
International, 159, 6-20. Kumar, S., Wesnousky, S., Rockwell, T.K., Ragnon,
D., Thakur, V.C., Seitz, G.G. 2001. Earthquake recurrence and rupture
dynamics of Himalayan Frontal Thrust Himalaya, India. Science, 294, 2328-
2331.
Lave, J., Avouac, J.P. 2000. Active folding of the fluvial terraces across
the Siwalik Hills, Himalaya of Central Nepal. Journal of Geophysical
Research, 105, 5735-5770. Malik, J.N., Nakata, T. 2003. Active fault and
related Late Quaternary deformation along the Northwestern Himalayan Frontal
Zone, India.
Annals of Geophysics, 46, 917-936. Malik, J.N., Nakata, T., Philip, G.,
Virdi, N.S. 2003. Preliminary observations from trench near Chandigarh, NW
Himalaya and their
bearing on active faulting. Current Science, 85 (12), 1793-1799. Nakata, T.
1989. Active faults of the Himalaya of India and Nepal. In: Malinconico, L.L.
& Lillie, R.L. (eds), Tectonics of the Western Himalaya. Geologfical Society
of America Paper, 232, 243-264. Power, P.M., Lille, R.J., Yeats, R.S. 1998.
Structure and shortening of the Kangra and Dehra Dun reentrants,
Sub-Himalaya, India. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 110, 1010-1027.
Raiverman, V., Ganju, J.L., Misra, V.N. 1979. A new look into the
stratigraphy of Cenozoic sediments of the Himalayan foothills between Ravi
and Yamuna Rivers. Geological Survey of India, Misc. Publication, 41,
233-246. Raiverman, Y., Srivastava, A.K., Prasad, D.N. 1993. On the foothill
thrust of northwestern Himalaya. Journal of Himalayan Geology, 4 (2),
237-256.
Scheilling, D., Arita, K. 1991. Thrust tectonics, crustal shortening, and
structure of the eastern Nepal Himalaya. Tectonics, 10 (5), 851-862. Singh,
P., Kumar, J., Ram, J. 2005. Concealed sub surface structures below Punjab
Alluvium: A geophysical Evidence. Special Publication of the
Palaeontological Society of India, 2, 31-39. Singh, Vimal, Tandon, S.K.
2007. Evidence and consequence of tilting of two alluvial fans in the
Pinjaur dun, Northwestern Himalaya Foothills.
Quaternary International, 159, 21-31. Suresh, N., Bagati, T.N., Kumar, R.,
Thakur, V.C. 2007. Evolution of Quaternary alluvial fans and terraces in the
intramontane Pinjaur Dun, Sub- Himalaya, NW India: interaction between
tectonics and climate change. Sedimentology, 54, 809-833. Tectonophysics,
32, 353-386. Valdiya, K.S. 2001. Reactivation of Himalayan Frontal Fault:
implications. Current Science, 85 (7), 1031-1040.
Yeats, R.S., Lillie, R.J. 1991. Contemporary tectonics of the Himalayan
frontal fault system: folds, blind thrusts and the 1905 Kangra earthquake.
Journal of Structural Geology, 13, 215-225.
|