|
Himalayan Geology, Vol. 30 (2), 2009, pp.115-122 Printed in India
Applying geodesy and modeling to test the role of climate
controlled erosion in shaping Himalayan morphology and evolution
BETH PRATT-SITAULA1, BISHAL NATH UPRETI2,
TIMOTHY MELBOURNE1,
ANDREW MINER1, EMILY PARKER1, SANTA MAN
RAI2, TARA NIDHI BHATTARAI2
1Central Washington
University, USA
2Tribhuvan University, Nepal
Abstract: The Himalaya-Tibet
system is the archetype of continent-continent collision, but the role of
climate in modulating orogenesis is a relatively new paradigm that has not
been well tested with field-based deformation measurements. Phenomenal
monsoon precipitation (>3 m/year) falls along the Himalayan front, and the
resulting erosion is thought by some to promote out-of-sequence thrusting or
even channel flow within the High Himalaya, leading to the observed,
profoundly steep morphology. Others attribute High Himalayan morphology to a
more traditional paradigm of a steeper underlying décollement ramp. The two
paradigms predict different patterns of current deformation, but both at
rates readily measurable with global positioning system (GPS). In this paper
we review the current impasse which researchers from both sides of the
debate have reached using methods of structural mapping, morphological
analysis, spirit-leveling, seismicity, thermochronometry, cosmogenically-determined
erosions rates, and thermokinetic modeling and propose that the addition of
continuous geodetic measurements of surface deformation combined with
elastic half-space modeling could help resolve the issue. To this end we
deployed a network of 6 permanent GPS stations in the Nepal Himalaya in
summer 2008 and have plans to expand to it to 16 stations. Preliminary model
results demonstrate that within a couple years differences between the two
paradigms should be discernable. |